This policy describes the approach used for Wedding Design's initial collection and the standards intended to guide later changes. It does not claim an established newsroom, independent expert review, or a history of recurring updates that has not taken place.
Topic selection
Articles are selected around distinct reader tasks: choosing a wedding theme, writing invitations, composing wishes or vows, selecting gifts, planning a budget, arranging a reception, and celebrating an anniversary. Related topics may link to one another, but a new title should add a useful purpose rather than repeat an existing guide.
The site aims to favor specific examples, decision criteria, and practical questions over generic encouragement. A topic belongs in the publication when it fits the wedding and couple-life scope and can be discussed without inventing information about people, businesses, or events.
Creation and review
The initial text was produced with AI-assisted drafting. It was checked for consistency of examples, unsupported personal credentials, fabricated experience, and basic site presentation. That check is not independent review by a wedding planner, lawyer, financial adviser, or other specialist.
Original wording examples and fictional scenarios are used to explain choices. Illustrative budgets are explicitly hypothetical. The site does not claim product testing, venue visits, interviews, or attendance at the events pictured. The publication byline is Wedding Design Editorial; it is not a personal professional identity.
Sources and factual boundaries
Primary resources are preferred for factual matters they are qualified to address. External links appear in the relevant paragraph so readers can examine the destination themselves. General creative advice may be original editorial guidance rather than sourced reporting. The distinction should remain clear.
Costs, stock, delivery conditions, venue rules, and official requirements can change. Articles do not guarantee current availability or quote unverified local obligations. Readers should confirm their own arrangements directly with the relevant service or authority. No local legal conclusion should be inferred from a general invitation or ceremony example.
Photography and visual examples
The images in the initial collection were generated with AI to illustrate editorial ideas. Captions identify their illustrative status. They are not documentary photographs of a real wedding, evidence of a supplier's work, or proof that a product was examined.
Images should not imply a celebrity endorsement, a real client relationship, or access to a particular venue. New visual material should preserve that distinction. Descriptive alternative text supports readers using assistive technology without adding promotional claims.
Commercial references and independence
The initial brief requested relevant contextual references to HeartfeltTexts, MessageBlessings, and GearCouple. Their inclusion was specified for this publication and should not be interpreted as the result of an independent competitive selection. The publication does not know or claim an ownership, payment, or affiliate arrangement beyond that instruction.
These links appear only where their topic fits the paragraph. GearCouple is a commercial destination, and its suggestions are not presented as products tested by Wedding Design. The current pages use no affiliate tracking codes. If compensation or another material relationship is introduced, the operator should add a clear disclosure close to the relevant recommendation and update this policy.
Corrections and contact
A useful correction identifies the page, the passage, what appears wrong, and a source or explanation where available. The static package currently has no working editorial submission channel. The contact form is visibly inactive and does not send messages. Please do not assume an issue has reached the publication by filling it in.
Once the operator activates a contact service, the contact page and privacy policy should describe it accurately. Corrections can then be assessed against the article's purpose and supporting information. Material factual changes should be reflected in the visible revision date; cosmetic edits do not need to suggest a new reporting event.
Dates and future updates
Published dates identify the initial edition. A date alone does not promise that every linked service, local rule, or price was verified that day. Revised dates should be added when a substantive change is actually made, with older unsupported statements removed rather than left beside new ones.
No automatic review schedule is claimed. Future maintenance should prioritize incorrect information, broken references, and changes that affect the usefulness of a guide. Readers remain responsible for checking time-sensitive arrangements before booking, buying, or relying on an external service.